Meraglim Blog

A Second Brexit Referendum Would Be a Stab in the Back. It Might Happen

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn

 

The U.K. Brexit referendum on whether to remain with or leave the European Union took place on June 23, 2016. The result was a clear victory for the “leave” forces.

Since then, the U.K. government has been negotiating with the EU about the exact terms and timing of Brexit. Those negotiations are coming to a head because a 2019 deadline for final exit with or without negotiated terms is looming.

The U.K. prime minister, Theresa May, is between a rock and a hard place. Many members of Parliament are opposed to Brexit and are doing nothing to support her in the negotiations. Other members of her own party support Brexit but believe May’s compromises in the negotiations leave the U.K. too close to the EU and defeat the purpose of Brexit.

Also opposing May are officials in Northern Ireland and Scotland who are strongly anti-Brexit and do not want to see their relations with the EU disrupted. Between the anti-Brexit forces and the hard-line Brexit forces, May cannot get a majority behind her efforts. May will carry on and is likely to arrive at a negotiated compromise that can get enough support in the end.

This has not stopped the anti-Brexit forces from trying to undo the original Brexit vote with calls for a new referendum. Chief among these uber-globalists is Anatole Kaletsky, a financial analyst and global activist.

I debated Kaletsky in Switzerland recently. He was condescending and a bit arrogant, which is what one expects from the globalists. He was also out of touch with popular sentiment, which is why he got it wrong in his original Brexit “remain” forecast.

As this article shows, Kaletsky is banking on widespread opposition and political stalemate to force another referendum as a way to ratify the final deal. He believes this new referendum will reject Brexit. This is wishful thinking on Kaletsky’s part, the same wishful thinking that caused him to miss Brexit in the first place.

But it’s a good lesson in the relentless methods of the globalists, who treat all setbacks as mere pauses in their quest for one world government. In the end, May will get the deal done despite the criticism and political posturing. Then Europe can go about the business of political integration without the U.K.

Institutional investors can schedule a proof of concept with the world’s first predictive data analytics firm combining human and artificial intelligence with complexity science. Check out Jim Rickard’s company at Meraglim Holdings to learn more.

 

IF THE SCIENCE IS NOT ON YOUR SIDE, JUST TRY THREATS

It’s clear that good science does not support the extreme claims of the climate alarmists. Yes, there is such a thing as climate change, but it’s slow, difficult to predict and almost impossible to model because of the complexity of the process. The climate alarmists have grabbed most of the headlines for the past ten

Read More »

WHY TRUMP WILL WIN REELECTION: NOT POLLS OR PUNDITS; JUST COMMON SENSE

Political analysts use polls, betting odds, historic trends and other inputs to make their (usually wrong) political predictions. We all remember that “experts” said Hillary Clinton would win the presidency in 2016 (they gave her a 92% chance on the morning of the election), and that the UK would vote to “remain” in the EU

Read More »

HERE’S ANOTHER ELITE WITH ANOTHER PLAN TO TAX AWAY YOUR WEALTH

The elites never rest when it comes to devising new ways to take your money through taxes, inflation or outright confiscation. The latest Trojan horse the elites are riding to take your money is climate change. The climate does change over long periods of time for reasons that are not well understood except that they

Read More »

KRUGMAN SHOWS HE KNOWS LITTLE ABOUT ECONOMICS AND LESS ABOUT FINANCE

We already knew that Nobel Prize winner Paul Krugman knows almost nothing about economics. Now, we see from this article that he knows nothing about banking either. Krugman claims that the repeal of Glass-Steagall and the actions of banks in general were not the cause of the 2008 financial crisis. The conventional wisdom is that Lehman Brothers,

Read More »
Scroll to Top