Meraglim Blog

Bitcoin Bubble Looks Like NASDAQ Dot.Com Crash, Only 15 Times Faster.

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn

 

Market bubbles are nothing new. In the 17th and 18th centuries we had the Dutch tulip bubble, the French Mississippi bubble and the UK’s South Sea bubble. The 19th century saw bubbles in canal building (1830s), gold (1869) and railroads (1890s). In the 20th and 21st centuries we have seen bubbles in Florida real estate (mid-1920s), stocks (late 1920s), dot.coms (2000), and mortgages (2007).

All of these episodes of investment mania crashed causing enormous losses for investors. As always, some investors got in early and got out before the crash and walked away with their winnings.

Analysts should remind themselves that those bubble winnings of the lucky few do not represent wealth creation or rewards for hard work, but a simple wealth transfer from a mass of latecomer losers to a lucky few winners. That’s hardly a desirable model for finance in particular or society as a whole, not least because the end result destroys confidence in markets and retards normal financial functions for a full generation.

The latest bubble is bitcoin. Last December as bitcoin was making its way higher from $8,000, I said that bitcoin might go to $20,000 (it did), but that it would surely come crashing down sooner than later (it did). I based this forecast on a NASDAQ chart showing the dot.com bubble of 1996-2000.

The hyperbolic rise in the price of bitcoin and dot.com stocks was a close fit, which made the subsequent crash easy to see coming. This article updates the bitcoin-NASDAQ comparison with up-to-date charts. Now that bitcoin has crashed more than 65% based on recent lows (with a slight bounce back lately) the resemblance to the NASDAQ dot.comepisode is even more dramatic.

The biggest difference between the two charts is that the bitcoin rise and fall happened 15 times faster than the NASDAQ collapse. Based on these charts, a projection of bitcoin at $2,000 is easily justified.

My own projection is much lower, but either way economic historians will look back on the bitcoin episode as the greatest bubble since the Dutch tulip bubble, maybe greater. At least with the tulip bubble, the last investors got to keep the tulip. With bitcoin, investors will end up with nothing.

 

IF THE SCIENCE IS NOT ON YOUR SIDE, JUST TRY THREATS

It’s clear that good science does not support the extreme claims of the climate alarmists. Yes, there is such a thing as climate change, but it’s slow, difficult to predict and almost impossible to model because of the complexity of the process. The climate alarmists have grabbed most of the headlines for the past ten

Read More »

WHY TRUMP WILL WIN REELECTION: NOT POLLS OR PUNDITS; JUST COMMON SENSE

Political analysts use polls, betting odds, historic trends and other inputs to make their (usually wrong) political predictions. We all remember that “experts” said Hillary Clinton would win the presidency in 2016 (they gave her a 92% chance on the morning of the election), and that the UK would vote to “remain” in the EU

Read More »

HERE’S ANOTHER ELITE WITH ANOTHER PLAN TO TAX AWAY YOUR WEALTH

The elites never rest when it comes to devising new ways to take your money through taxes, inflation or outright confiscation. The latest Trojan horse the elites are riding to take your money is climate change. The climate does change over long periods of time for reasons that are not well understood except that they

Read More »

KRUGMAN SHOWS HE KNOWS LITTLE ABOUT ECONOMICS AND LESS ABOUT FINANCE

We already knew that Nobel Prize winner Paul Krugman knows almost nothing about economics. Now, we see from this article that he knows nothing about banking either. Krugman claims that the repeal of Glass-Steagall and the actions of banks in general were not the cause of the 2008 financial crisis. The conventional wisdom is that Lehman Brothers,

Read More »
Scroll to Top