Very few issues unite policy thinkers on the left and right these days. Yet, guaranteed basic income, GBI, is one that does. GBI has been endorsed by left-wing Silicon Valley billionaires like Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk, and by right-wing public intellectuals like Charles Murray.
GBI goes by various names including universal basic income, but the idea is the same. Government will send everyone below a certain income level a check to get that individual up to a reasonable middle-class standard of living.
The idea has been around since Thomas Paine proposed it in 1797. Ancient versions include the bread dole of the Roman Empire ridiculed by the poet Juvenal as “panem et circenses,” (bread and circuses). The 21st century version rests on the idea that robots will soon take most jobs (except those of the elites), and that economic returns to capital versus labor strongly favor capital resulting in extreme income inequality.
The elites believe they need to appease the workers with cash to prevent a revolution. Karl Marx would be proud. Most of our articles are brief and to the point, and are selected to illustrate some emerging economic threat. This article is much longer than usual, but that’s because the topic is of the utmost importance. The subject of GBI goes straight to the heart of questions like, “What is a democracy?” “What is fairness in society?” and “Are some values more important than money?”
Most importantly, the issue is not going away — you’ll be hearing a lot about it. GBI promises to be at the top of the political agenda for years to come.
Kim Jong Un kept up a rapid operational tempo of missile launches and nuclear weapons tests from January through September 2017. Suddenly he has gone quiet.
Over two months have passed since he launched a missile or detonated a nuclear bomb. It would be nice to think that he “got the message” from Washington and has decided to scale back his nuclear and ICBM ambitions. Maybe pressure from China and elsewhere in the form of economic sanctions is starting to work. Perhaps Kim is looking for a diplomatic way out of the escalatory dynamic he created.
We can be hopeful about that since any of those developments might avoid a war. But this article suggests that Kim’s pause is tactical rather than a strategic about-face.
No one knows exactly what Kim is up to. He may have wanted to pause his tests during the Chinese Communist Party Congress in late October and Trump’s visit to Beijing in early November in order not to be overly provocative. Some analysts suggest Kim is turning his attention to internal matters and shoring up popular support before entering the final phase of his nuclear showdown with the United States.
The best posture is to follow the classic advice of, “Hope for the best, but prepare for the worst.” Now that the Chinese Party Congress and Trump’s Asia visit are over, it may soon be back to business as usual for the North Korean dictator.
In recent days, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a historic tax reform bill (the first since 1986), and the Senate Finance Committee approved a different Senate version of the tax reform bill and sent it to the full Senate for a vote. This sets up the possibility of a full Senate vote after Thanksgiving, followed by a House-Senate Conference to reconcile the two versions of the bill, then a final vote on a single bill passed by both houses of Congress before Christmas and presidential approval before the end of the year.
That’s the good news. Here’s the bad news. There are plenty of hurdles in the way as this article describes. Before the Senate can take up the tax bill, the House and Senate both have to deal with a possible government shutdown on December 8. That means finding some compromise on a long list of hot button issues including funding for Trump’s wall with Mexico, deportation of illegal immigrants brought to the U.S. as children (the “Dreamer Act” also referred to as “DACA”), funding for Planned Parenthood, funding for Obamacare (called “SCHIP”), and more.
Then there’s the fact that Republicans can only lose two votes from their Senators before the entire process fails. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin has already come out against the bill and others may follow. This is further complicated by the possible loss of a Republican Senate seat in a special election on December 12 in Alabama because of the Roy Moore scandals.
The stock market has already priced in a tax cut. Markets won’t go up much more if the bill passes because they already expect it to pass. But if the bill fails (for any or all of the reasons listed above) markets could plunge on the bad news. Seems like a good time to lighten up equity exposure and go to cash until the legislative dust settles.
I have been baffled for years at Americans’ inability to understand Europe and the euro. In 2010, prominent economists such as Paul Krugman, Joe Stiglitz, and Nouriel Roubini were running around saying that Greece should be kicked out of the Eurozone.
They said Spain should quit the euro, go back to the peseta as a currency, and devalue. They also said the Eurozone should break into a “two-tier” structure with a Northern Tier of hard currency countries like Germany and the Netherlands, and a Southern Tier of currency weaklings like Italy and France. I publicly argued with all of them at the time.
I said no countries were being kicked out, no countries would quit, and new members would be added over time. That’s exactly what happened. When I made my forecast there were 16 members of the Eurozone. Now there are 19 members and a 20th is on the way soon with others waiting in the wings. (The UK “Brexit” is another matter because the UK never joined the Eurozone. They are exiting the EU, which is not the same as the Eurozone. The Eurozone is far more important precisely because it has its own currency and central bank).
I even wrote an entire chapter on the economic strengths of Europe in my 2014 book, The Death of Money. This article vindicates the view I have taken all along. It explains how Europe has become a magnet for direct foreign investment, and has taken steps to address longstanding issues of labor mobility and inefficient regulation.
The euro is poised for a major rally against the U.S. dollar. This article explains why.
Venezuelan debt crashed and burned last week as described in this article. The major state-owned oil company, Petroleos de Venezuela SA, or PDVSA, defaulted on its debt. S&P and Fitch ratings declared the company to be in default. The International Swaps & Derivatives Association (ISDA, the rule-making body on over-the-counter derivatives) declared PDVSA credit default swaps to be payable also.
The PDVSA is likely to be the first of many Venezuelan defaults. Government debt looks unpayable, and is currently being renegotiated, which is another kind of default. Other Venezuelan companies with dollar-denominated debt are in worse shape. None of this comes as a shock.
Venezuelan credit has been deteriorating for over a decade under the rule of first Hugo Chavez, and now Nicolás Maduro. The Venezuela currency, the bolívar, is essentially worthless and civil society has descended into chaos bordering on civil war. Yet, the significance of this story goes far beyond Venezuela.
The 1998 global financial crisis started with a simple Thai default in 1997. The 2008 global financial crisis started with an uptick in mortgage defaults in 2006. Financial crises have a “snowflake and avalanche” dynamic in which small catalysts (the snowflake) soon cause catastrophic results (the avalanche).
The Venezuelan crisis definitely has the potential to spread to other emerging markets and possibly cause a new global financial crisis in 2018.