Meraglim Blog

Even a Dovish Fed Won’t Stop the Rate Hikes. Get Ready for Volatility

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn

 

The Fed is so confused it’s beginning to confuse the markets too.

The basic Fed model set up by Janet Yellen and continued by Jay Powell was that the Fed would raise rates four times per year (March, June, September and December), by 0.25% each time, until the fed funds target rate hit 3.75%, at which point the Fed would step back and evaluate the situation. The rate hikes had nothing to do with “data” and everything to do with having dry powder for the next recession.

The only exception to this clockwork program would be an occasional “pause” if the Fed saw strong disinflation, disorderly market declines or job losses. The finesse was to raise rates without causing the recession the Fed was bracing to cure.

While Wall Street jabbered about other factors (yield curve, nonexistent inflation, bad days in the market), the Fed stayed on track So far, so good.

Yellen threw a monkey wrench into this with her “quantitative tightening” (QT) started in October 2017. QT is the equivalent of burning money, the opposite of QE. Then Powell threw another monkey wrench with his early October comment that the Fed was a “long way” from a “neutral” policy rate. This was a mistake, because “neutral” doesn’t exist (it’s another meaningless academic theory) and neutral is not the Fed’s real goal anyway (it’s the 3.75% target).

This hawkish comment sent markets into a tailspin in October. Powell corrected the record in November by saying the Fed was actually “just below” neutral (another irrelevant comment, but markets cheered and reversed some October losses). As this article reports, the Fed is now boxed in by Powell’s sloppiness.

There’s a Fed meeting on Dec. 19. If Powell is dovish, there may be a year-end “Christmas rally” on Wall Street. If Powell is hawkish, markets may tank going into year-end. But the entire debate is like a false flag operation because it has nothing to do with the Fed’s real goal of dry powder.

Powell is not an economist; he’s a lawyer. He should stick to a pragmatic approach and not get pulled into the academic mumbo-jumbo about the “neutral” rate. The Fed will probably try to square the circle with slightly more dovish economic forecasts and slightly more hawkish comments on “gradual” rate hikes.

Meanwhile, the QT juggernaut is slowing the economy with or without rate hikes. The market can digest all of this along with their Christmas turkeys. Confusion reigns.

Institutional investors can schedule a proof of concept with the world’s first predictive data analytics firm combining human and artificial intelligence with complexity science. Check out Jim Rickard’s company at Meraglim Holdings to learn more.

 

IF THE SCIENCE IS NOT ON YOUR SIDE, JUST TRY THREATS

It’s clear that good science does not support the extreme claims of the climate alarmists. Yes, there is such a thing as climate change, but it’s slow, difficult to predict and almost impossible to model because of the complexity of the process. The climate alarmists have grabbed most of the headlines for the past ten

Read More »

WHY TRUMP WILL WIN REELECTION: NOT POLLS OR PUNDITS; JUST COMMON SENSE

Political analysts use polls, betting odds, historic trends and other inputs to make their (usually wrong) political predictions. We all remember that “experts” said Hillary Clinton would win the presidency in 2016 (they gave her a 92% chance on the morning of the election), and that the UK would vote to “remain” in the EU

Read More »

HERE’S ANOTHER ELITE WITH ANOTHER PLAN TO TAX AWAY YOUR WEALTH

The elites never rest when it comes to devising new ways to take your money through taxes, inflation or outright confiscation. The latest Trojan horse the elites are riding to take your money is climate change. The climate does change over long periods of time for reasons that are not well understood except that they

Read More »

KRUGMAN SHOWS HE KNOWS LITTLE ABOUT ECONOMICS AND LESS ABOUT FINANCE

We already knew that Nobel Prize winner Paul Krugman knows almost nothing about economics. Now, we see from this article that he knows nothing about banking either. Krugman claims that the repeal of Glass-Steagall and the actions of banks in general were not the cause of the 2008 financial crisis. The conventional wisdom is that Lehman Brothers,

Read More »
Scroll to Top