Meraglim Blog

Even Mainstream Economists Agree That Mainstream Economics Is False

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn

It’s one thing when a nonmainstream economist criticizes mainstream economics. That happens all the time and is for the most part ignored by economists. It’s another thing when a member in good standing of the economic elite unleashes a harsh criticism. That’s a sure sign that the mainstream neo-Keynesian consensus is on its last legs.

That’s exactly the implication of this article. The article is written by Jim O’Neill, a former senior office of Goldman Sachs. O’Neill was the originator of the “BRICS” name to describe the group of developing economies (Brazil, Russia, India, China and later South Africa) that would lead emerging-markets growth and boost global growth in the early 2000s.

O’Neill’s latest work takes aim at cherished economic models such as the Phillips curve (unemployment and inflation are not inversely related, as claimed), strong profits attracting new investment (instead it appears that anti-competitive practices are blocking new investment) and stock buybacks being good for markets (they are actually a kind of corporate liquidation and should not be subsidized by governments). This critique (one we’ve been making for years) is long overdue.

One area where O’Neill does stick to the mainstream view is that China’s growth is welcome and China will gradually move to a market-friendly model and become a strong economic ally of the U.S. This view was never correct. China is a communist society that is hostile to the U.S. China will take all of the direct foreign investment and intellectual property that we are prepared to hand over (or that they are able to steal), but they will not evolve into a genuinely Western-style economy.

O’Neill deserves credit for critiquing the touchstones of modern economics, but he is still engaged in wishful thinking when it comes to China. It looks like O’Neill is not ready to give up on the “C” in BRICS just yet. He should. China’s adversarial posture toward the U.S. and rejection of Western norms becomes more apparent by the day.

Institutional investors can schedule a proof of concept with the world’s first predictive data analytics firm combining human and artificial intelligence with complexity science. Check out Jim Rickard’s company at Meraglim Holdings to learn more.

IF THE SCIENCE IS NOT ON YOUR SIDE, JUST TRY THREATS

It’s clear that good science does not support the extreme claims of the climate alarmists. Yes, there is such a thing as climate change, but it’s slow, difficult to predict and almost impossible to model because of the complexity of the process. The climate alarmists have grabbed most of the headlines for the past ten

Read More »

WHY TRUMP WILL WIN REELECTION: NOT POLLS OR PUNDITS; JUST COMMON SENSE

Political analysts use polls, betting odds, historic trends and other inputs to make their (usually wrong) political predictions. We all remember that “experts” said Hillary Clinton would win the presidency in 2016 (they gave her a 92% chance on the morning of the election), and that the UK would vote to “remain” in the EU

Read More »

HERE’S ANOTHER ELITE WITH ANOTHER PLAN TO TAX AWAY YOUR WEALTH

The elites never rest when it comes to devising new ways to take your money through taxes, inflation or outright confiscation. The latest Trojan horse the elites are riding to take your money is climate change. The climate does change over long periods of time for reasons that are not well understood except that they

Read More »

KRUGMAN SHOWS HE KNOWS LITTLE ABOUT ECONOMICS AND LESS ABOUT FINANCE

We already knew that Nobel Prize winner Paul Krugman knows almost nothing about economics. Now, we see from this article that he knows nothing about banking either. Krugman claims that the repeal of Glass-Steagall and the actions of banks in general were not the cause of the 2008 financial crisis. The conventional wisdom is that Lehman Brothers,

Read More »
Scroll to Top