Meraglim Blog

Once You Move Sourcing out of China, It Doesn’t Come Back

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn

A lot of the criticism of Trump’s trade war tactics with China is based on a misunderstanding of the dynamics of global trade and global supply chains. When the U.S. imports goods from China and then imposes a tariff, the analysts simply multiply the quantity of goods by the size of the tariff and proclaim on happy-talk TV that the “cost” of the tariffs to U.S. consumers will be the result of that multiplication.

This method is badly flawed in several ways. The first problem is that the tariffs may not be passed along to consumers, especially in a world of low inflation. Tariff costs may be absorbed by the importers (resulting in lower margins) or pushed back to the suppliers (resulting in reduced profits) and not passed to consumers. The actual result is likely to be some combination of all three effects, but the impact on consumers is still far less than the talking heads estimate.

The second and more serious problem for Chinese exports, as explained in this article, is that U.S. importers will change the source of their imports from China to another jurisdiction that does not suffer from high U.S. tariffs.

The article describes how Costco, which faces stiff competition from Amazon and Walmart, is already taking steps in this direction. Vietnam is a likely source for manufactured goods currently produced by China. The problem with this kind of resourcing is that once the U.S. importers abandon China, they will not come back.

This is one of the strongest levers the U.S. holds in the U.S.-China trade war and one reason why China is desperately seeking a solution that will end the war quickly.

Institutional investors can schedule a proof of concept with the world’s first predictive data analytics firm combining human and artificial intelligence with complexity science. Check out Jim Rickard’s company at Meraglim Holdings to learn more.

IF THE SCIENCE IS NOT ON YOUR SIDE, JUST TRY THREATS

It’s clear that good science does not support the extreme claims of the climate alarmists. Yes, there is such a thing as climate change, but it’s slow, difficult to predict and almost impossible to model because of the complexity of the process. The climate alarmists have grabbed most of the headlines for the past ten

Read More »

WHY TRUMP WILL WIN REELECTION: NOT POLLS OR PUNDITS; JUST COMMON SENSE

Political analysts use polls, betting odds, historic trends and other inputs to make their (usually wrong) political predictions. We all remember that “experts” said Hillary Clinton would win the presidency in 2016 (they gave her a 92% chance on the morning of the election), and that the UK would vote to “remain” in the EU

Read More »

HERE’S ANOTHER ELITE WITH ANOTHER PLAN TO TAX AWAY YOUR WEALTH

The elites never rest when it comes to devising new ways to take your money through taxes, inflation or outright confiscation. The latest Trojan horse the elites are riding to take your money is climate change. The climate does change over long periods of time for reasons that are not well understood except that they

Read More »

KRUGMAN SHOWS HE KNOWS LITTLE ABOUT ECONOMICS AND LESS ABOUT FINANCE

We already knew that Nobel Prize winner Paul Krugman knows almost nothing about economics. Now, we see from this article that he knows nothing about banking either. Krugman claims that the repeal of Glass-Steagall and the actions of banks in general were not the cause of the 2008 financial crisis. The conventional wisdom is that Lehman Brothers,

Read More »
Scroll to Top