Meraglim Blog

What’s a Worse Sign Than Yield Curve Inversion? A Bear Steepener

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn

You’ve seen and heard endless reporting about the “inverted” yield curve and how it’s a top recession indicator. What exactly does that mean?

The yield curve is just a matter of connecting the dots on a chart, which represents particular yields on bonds of particular maturities. For example, right now the 10-year Treasury note has a yield-to-maturity of 2.007% and the 30-year bond has a yield-to-maturity of 2.533%. If you draw a line between those two yields, you get a curve that slopes upward from left to right as you move to longer maturities.

Normally, the entire yield curve slopes upward from left to right as you move out from 3-month bills to 30-year bonds. That makes sense because longer maturities have more risk of losing money due to inflation or default so they deserve a higher yield (what’s called the “risk premium”). There’s just one problem – that upward slope is not true today.

The 3-month bill yields 2.101%, but the 5-year note yields 1.768%. That means the yield curve slopes down from 3-months to 5-years before sloping up again to the 10-year maturity and beyond. That dip in the curve from 3-months to 5-years is called an “inverted” yield curve because yields drop instead of rising.

An inverted yield curve is considered a sign of recession because the market is saying the Fed may have to raise rates in the short run (to cool off the economy) but longer run rates will be lower (once the recession hits). But that analysis is unlikely to be true today because the Fed has distorted and manipulated the entire yield curve with its QE and QT policies.

It’s hard to know how to interpret the yield curve today except to say the Fed has messed it up and should stop its manipulation. Is the yield curve telling us anything else? According to this article, the answer is an emphatic yes.

In addition to inverting, the yield curve is now steepening. This doesn’t mean all rates are going up. It means the “spread” or difference between short-term and long-term rates is expanding. That can be bullish (investors expect growth and higher rates) or bearish (investors expect recession and are running for safe-haven assets).

We’ll find out soon enough. For now, the inversion plus steepening is being taken by some as a sure sign of recession.

Institutional investors can schedule a proof of concept with the world’s first predictive data analytics firm combining human and artificial intelligence with complexity science. Check out Jim Rickard’s company at Meraglim Holdings to learn more.

 

IF THE SCIENCE IS NOT ON YOUR SIDE, JUST TRY THREATS

It’s clear that good science does not support the extreme claims of the climate alarmists. Yes, there is such a thing as climate change, but it’s slow, difficult to predict and almost impossible to model because of the complexity of the process. The climate alarmists have grabbed most of the headlines for the past ten

Read More »

WHY TRUMP WILL WIN REELECTION: NOT POLLS OR PUNDITS; JUST COMMON SENSE

Political analysts use polls, betting odds, historic trends and other inputs to make their (usually wrong) political predictions. We all remember that “experts” said Hillary Clinton would win the presidency in 2016 (they gave her a 92% chance on the morning of the election), and that the UK would vote to “remain” in the EU

Read More »

HERE’S ANOTHER ELITE WITH ANOTHER PLAN TO TAX AWAY YOUR WEALTH

The elites never rest when it comes to devising new ways to take your money through taxes, inflation or outright confiscation. The latest Trojan horse the elites are riding to take your money is climate change. The climate does change over long periods of time for reasons that are not well understood except that they

Read More »

KRUGMAN SHOWS HE KNOWS LITTLE ABOUT ECONOMICS AND LESS ABOUT FINANCE

We already knew that Nobel Prize winner Paul Krugman knows almost nothing about economics. Now, we see from this article that he knows nothing about banking either. Krugman claims that the repeal of Glass-Steagall and the actions of banks in general were not the cause of the 2008 financial crisis. The conventional wisdom is that Lehman Brothers,

Read More »
Scroll to Top