Meraglim Blog

Don’t Believe the Happy Talk on U.S. Trade Negotiations With China

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

The U.S. was set to activate a new wave of steep tariffs on imports from China on Jan. 1, 2019. Those tariffs would have provoked more retaliation from China, although China’s scope was limited because they were running out of U.S. imports to apply tariffs to since China buys far less from the U.S. than the U.S. buys from China.

In early December, President Trump and Chinese President Xi reached a 90-day “truce” whereby they agreed to hold off on new tariffs until March 1, 2019, to give time for both sides to negotiate the most contentious issues and arrive at a mutually satisfactory agreement that would end the trade war.

Not much happened in December, although China indicated it would roll back some of its 2018 tariffs and buy more soybeans from the U.S. This did not represent real progress since it only restored the status quo and did nothing to solve the more contentious issues of theft of intellectual property and limitations on direct foreign investment.

Since Jan. 1, the White House has issued a series of upbeat statements suggesting the trade talks were going well and a positive outcome might be within reach. The Chinese echoed these views. Markets responded positively to the prospect of the trade wars winding down.

Not so fast. According to this article, the U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer told Congress that very little progress has been made on the tough issues of intellectual property and investment restrictions. China is unlikely to concede much on these issues because it relies on stolen technology to make its own industries globally competitive. Trump is unlikely to conclude an agreement that does not offer protections in these areas that are substantive and verifiable.

It’s possible that the 90-day truce will be extended if some progress is made in the next six weeks. But it’s also possible that the U.S. will end the truce and raise tariffs as originally planned in order to force China’s hand.

Markets are not ready for a blow-up in these trade talks. Investors should be.

Institutional investors can schedule a proof of concept with the world’s first predictive data analytics firm combining human and artificial intelligence with complexity science. Check out Jim Rickard’s company at Meraglim Holdings to learn more.

QCI and Meraglim Join Forces to Deliver Capital Markets Risk Analysis Powered by QCI’s Mukai Quantum Computing Software Platform

LEESBURG, VA, December 1, 2020 – Quantum Computing Inc.(OTCQB: QUBT) (QCI), the technology leader in quantum-readysoftware development and execution, and the only public pure play in quantum computing, has partnered with Meraglim Holdings Corporation to deliver advanced capital market risk analysis powered by QCI’s performance-leading Mukai™ quantum software development and execution platform. As an industry leader in predictive analytics, Meraglim was the first

Read More »

IF THE SCIENCE IS NOT ON YOUR SIDE, JUST TRY THREATS

It’s clear that good science does not support the extreme claims of the climate alarmists. Yes, there is such a thing as climate change, but it’s slow, difficult to predict and almost impossible to model because of the complexity of the process. The climate alarmists have grabbed most of the headlines for the past ten

Read More »

WHY TRUMP WILL WIN REELECTION: NOT POLLS OR PUNDITS; JUST COMMON SENSE

Political analysts use polls, betting odds, historic trends and other inputs to make their (usually wrong) political predictions. We all remember that “experts” said Hillary Clinton would win the presidency in 2016 (they gave her a 92% chance on the morning of the election), and that the UK would vote to “remain” in the EU

Read More »

HERE’S ANOTHER ELITE WITH ANOTHER PLAN TO TAX AWAY YOUR WEALTH

The elites never rest when it comes to devising new ways to take your money through taxes, inflation or outright confiscation. The latest Trojan horse the elites are riding to take your money is climate change. The climate does change over long periods of time for reasons that are not well understood except that they

Read More »
Scroll to Top