Meraglim Blog

Driving a Tesla? You’re Causing More CO2 Emissions Than a Diesel Engine

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn

Do you drive a Tesla? Does someone you know?

Tesla drivers are generally a self-satisfied lot. The cars have had a lot of well-publicized problems including battery fires and quality-control issues with doors, windows and other onboard systems. The battery range of about 275 miles is a bit confining for me; I often take trips of 300–400 miles.

But there is no denying that the body designs are great and the driving performance is superior. Acceleration is fast and the engine is almost silent. That’s a rare experience.

I always objected to the $7,500 tax credit per car. Whenever I saw a Tesla on the road, I always glared at the driver and thought, You owe me $7,500 because your credit came out of my taxes. That aside, I support innovation and free markets, so if someone wanted to build these cars and someone else wanted to buy them that was fine with me.

The one thing that was indisputable was that the cars reduce air pollution and CO2 emissions. Or do they?

According to this article, Teslas turn out to have more CO2 emissions than a typical “dirty” diesel engine. There are two main reasons for this.

The Tesla batteries are made from lithium, manganese and cobalt, which are mined with energy-intensive means that emit CO2. The batteries on the car are charged from the power grid, which is still largely coal fired (sorry, there’s not much wind or solar contributing to the grid). When these exogenous sources of CO2 are added to the equation, the Tesla is one of the dirtiest cars on earth.

Just remember that the next time you see one at a “clean” charging station. Tesla has financial and production problems, but being singled out as a “dirty car” that contributes to high CO2 emissions was probably not on management’s radar screen. Now it is.

Institutional investors can schedule a proof of concept with the world’s first predictive data analytics firm combining human and artificial intelligence with complexity science. Check out Jim Rickard’s company at Meraglim Holdings to learn more.

IF THE SCIENCE IS NOT ON YOUR SIDE, JUST TRY THREATS

It’s clear that good science does not support the extreme claims of the climate alarmists. Yes, there is such a thing as climate change, but it’s slow, difficult to predict and almost impossible to model because of the complexity of the process. The climate alarmists have grabbed most of the headlines for the past ten

Read More »

WHY TRUMP WILL WIN REELECTION: NOT POLLS OR PUNDITS; JUST COMMON SENSE

Political analysts use polls, betting odds, historic trends and other inputs to make their (usually wrong) political predictions. We all remember that “experts” said Hillary Clinton would win the presidency in 2016 (they gave her a 92% chance on the morning of the election), and that the UK would vote to “remain” in the EU

Read More »

HERE’S ANOTHER ELITE WITH ANOTHER PLAN TO TAX AWAY YOUR WEALTH

The elites never rest when it comes to devising new ways to take your money through taxes, inflation or outright confiscation. The latest Trojan horse the elites are riding to take your money is climate change. The climate does change over long periods of time for reasons that are not well understood except that they

Read More »

KRUGMAN SHOWS HE KNOWS LITTLE ABOUT ECONOMICS AND LESS ABOUT FINANCE

We already knew that Nobel Prize winner Paul Krugman knows almost nothing about economics. Now, we see from this article that he knows nothing about banking either. Krugman claims that the repeal of Glass-Steagall and the actions of banks in general were not the cause of the 2008 financial crisis. The conventional wisdom is that Lehman Brothers,

Read More »
Scroll to Top