Readers are familiar with my thesis that currency wars are followed by trade wars and then finally shooting wars among major powers. This happened in the 1930s and it seems to be happening again.
Currency wars begin in a condition of too much debt and not enough growth. Countries steal growth from their trading partners by cheapening their currencies to promote exports and import inflation. The present currency war started in January 2010.
The problem is that currency wars don’t work in the long run because trading partners retaliate with their own devaluations. Currency cross-rates end up back where they started, with costs imposed due to the uncertainties. Once countries realize that currency wars don’t work, they turn quickly to trade wars through tariffs and other trade barriers.
The problem is that trade wars don’t work either, for the same reason currency wars don’t work — retaliation or tit-for-tat tariffs soon put everyone back where they started. The new trade war started in January 2018 with the announcement of tariffs, and those tariffs actually began to take effect last week.
Just because trade wars have started does not mean the currency wars are over, as this article shows. The currency wars and trade wars continue side by side. In fact, they are related.
If the U.S. puts tariffs on China, which we have, then China can fight back two ways. The first is to impose their own tariffs on U.S. exports, which they have. The second is to cheapen their currency to offset the impact of the tariffs. If the U.S. imposes a 25% tariff on China but China cheapens its currency by 25%, then everyone is back where they started in terms of the cost of Chinese goods to U.S. consumers.
There are individual winners and losers from the currency and trade wars, but the global economy as a whole is definitely a loser. We should look for slower growth and possibly a recession as the trade and currency wars play out. Let’s hope that history does not repeat and that we don’t end up in a Third World War.
Accredited investors interested in learning more about Jim Rickard’s private placement in the world’s first predictive data analytics startup that combines human and artificial intelligence with complexity science should check out his offering at Meraglim Holdings. Click the link to learn more.
It’s clear that good science does not support the extreme claims of the climate alarmists. Yes, there is such a thing as climate change, but it’s slow, difficult to predict and almost impossible to model because of the complexity of the process. The climate alarmists have grabbed most of the headlines for the past ten